What is the Science Based Targets Initiative and how can you use it to help reduce your emissions?

Science-based targets initiative (SBTi) are specific, measurable goals that organizations set to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the latest climate science and the global effort to limit global warming. These targets are designed to ensure that emission reduction efforts are consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement.

In the context of emission reduction, science-based targets go beyond traditional, arbitrary reduction goals. Instead, they are developed by considering the carbon budget, which represents the total amount of emissions that can be released into the atmosphere while staying within a certain temperature threshold. This involves assessing the current emissions trajectory, the organization's contribution to global emissions, and the sectoral and regional emission reduction pathways needed to meet global climate goals.

Contact us

+44 (0) 20 7283 4646

Submit an enquiry

Steps for establishing science-based targets

The organization calculates its current greenhouse gas emissions across its operations, including direct emissions (Scope 1) from its own activities, indirect emissions (Scope 2) from purchased electricity, and often indirect emissions (Scope 3) from its supply chain and other sources.

The organization determines its emissions reduction pathway that aligns with the overall climate goals. This involves setting a target that aims to limit global warming to a specific level, usually well below 2 degrees Celsius or 1.5 degrees Celsius.

The organization assesses the sectoral and regional emission reduction efforts necessary to achieve the chosen temperature goal. This ensures that the organization's target is in line with broader global efforts and is fair considering its industry and geographic context.

Based on the above analysis, the organization sets a specific emissions reduction target. This target could be a percentage reduction in emissions over a certain time frame, such as reducing emissions by 50% by 2030 compared to a baseline year.

Organizations committing to science-based targets provide regular progress reports on their emissions reductions. These reports are often verified by third-party experts to ensure transparency and credibility.

The benefits of Science Based Targets

By adopting science-based targets, organizations take a more responsible and proactive approach to mitigating climate change. These targets not only contribute to the global effort to limit temperature rise but also enhance an organization's sustainability, resilience, and reputation. As more companies and entities adopt science-based targets, the overall momentum for effective emission reduction increases.

Please accept marketing-cookies to watch this video.
Net Zero Targets and Science-based Targets - What's the difference? YouTube

Related content

Read more

Climate change refers to long-term alterations in Earth's average weather patterns, primarily driven by the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. These gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), trap heat from the sun that would otherwise escape into space, leading to a warming of the planet.

As nations around the globe ramp up action their against climate change and move their economies towards net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, new practices, opportunities and indeed challenges are likely to arise for their respective ports and logistics operations. However, every journey will be unique, knowing what to consider and where to start will be starkly different for a freight forwarder versus a port or container terminal.

In brief, carbon offsetting involves compensating for emissions by supporting external projects, while carbon capture is about capturing and managing emissions directly from your own operations. Both approaches play a role in reducing a company's overall carbon impact, but they target emissions at different stages of the carbon lifecycle.

As a result of escalating concerns over the consequences of global climate change, various regulatory frameworks have emerged. As scientific consensus solidifies around the human influence on rising temperatures, policymakers worldwide are facing an urgent mandate to design and implement measures that curtail carbon emissions, promote sustainable practices, and safeguard vulnerable ecosystems.